Therapeutic Writing: Double-Bind, Paradox and the Therapeutic Journal


Welcome.
 
My interest here is the therapeutic benefit of journal writing with a particular emphasis upon the healing potential of the humour and irony that emerges within this form of recording.
 
The initial framework for my thinking is the notion that a fully lived life involves processes of discovering and of creating and that the link between them is essentially indefinable. We must be fully committed to both and trust the intuitive play between.
Both discovering and creating are features of human adaptation. Discovering is an evolutional development of instinctual mammalian behaviour. Creating, however, is a step change, as it is rooted in the exclusively human psychological shift that reveals our mortality.
 
A stable enough sense of individuality evolves through active expression- the use of language. If there is no integrated sense of self there is no real independence, an essential element of an authentic life.
 
There always remains a gap between our words and the world. The ambiguity inherent in this condition is a source of our power and vitality but also remains a significant seam of vulnerability. We trust the language we use to bridge this gap. Double-binds are belief traps that destroy this trust, simultaneously attacking the realms of discovering and creating.
 
Journal writing is one way back.
Therapeutic processes described in this article recreate conditions for play. Feelings and thoughts held in writing are tagged with humour. This encourages reflection. When we attend to the complex and somewhat paradoxical interplay of these affective and cognitive modes of experience we face irony. We return to the gap between words and the world and the comforting realisation of our limits as human beings and an acceptance of what we are and of our mortality
 
And so, paper and pencil and two basic rules- 'Write until you smile' 'Look back for the humour' - open and free to all.

 
 
 
DOUBLE-BIND, PARADOX AND THE THERAPEUTIC JOURNAL
by Jim Cheek
August 2007

 
‘My contribution is to ask for a paradox to be accepted and tolerated and respected, and for it not to be resolved. By flight to split-off intellectual functioning it is possible to resolve the paradox, but the price of this is the loss of the value of the paradox itself.’ D.W.Winnicott Introduction to Playing and Reality (1971)
 
 
A fully lived life possesses an exciting and mysterious edge. The very precariousness of our understanding is part of the appeal- we really are non-stable beings and require momentum to maintain mental health.
The flexibility of our language and the trust with which we imbue it normally allows us to live with this underlying fluidity of experience. Somehow we know when to stop analysing and we allow language to paper-over gaps in our understanding. However, these gaps remain a serious seam of vulnerability.
 
Threats to our being come in many guises and it would seem natural to expect some of these threats to be mediated through the ambiguities of language. My main concern in this writing is the way trust in language can be threatened through misrepresentation and misinterpretation and how this can come about in apparently benign circumstances. Language is built upon trust. If this trust is destroyed so is the language used. Once damaged, language has to be recreated. Words, their origins, meanings and use, have to be looked at afresh. This is a challenging task and one that I feel will always require more than just thought and talk.
 
It is childhood experience that I look to first, particularly those moments of real wonder- that fundamental shift when a fine balance between feeling and thinking resonates magically with a budding sense of becoming. No matter how hazy or idiosyncratic these memories may be or how difficult they are to tease apart, this seems the place to start.
And the easiest way in is through a story.

 
I remember early childhood being a good time. Long hot sunny summers and the occasional magical winter white out. No wet grey bleak in-between days like we get now. We lived in a tiny hamlet deep in farming country with an underused church and chapel but little else. Dad had recently been appointed head teacher of a secondary school in the small market town a short car ride away. He was young, ambitious and a happy man.
 
A large rambling garden backed our isolated cottage. Dad’s playground. His grey suit came off and his grubby old green shirt and baggy shorts were on before the car had cooled. Re-fuelled with a mug of coffee he would be heading for the vegetable garden with me in tow, struggling to push the old barrow full of tools. The flowerbeds and borders were ignored or dug up. His mission was growing fruit and vegetables for the year even if that meant storing every wizened apple or freezing so many beans that we sometimes ate the wrong vintage. We would work together until called to eat. Bath and bed and sound sleep awaited me. He worked on to sunset.
 
On occasional Sundays dad helped out at chapel as a lay preacher. Mum and I would go along when he took the service. The place smelt of pine resin and damp. There was the distraction of funny hats and hair-dos and some very bizarre singing but the sermons were long and boring for a small boy and I would drift off into other more interesting inner worlds of my own. Dad talked from the pulpit of moral fibre, I thought of Sunday dinner.
 
A small stream marked the lower boundary of the vegetable garden. Beyond it lay a rabbit cropped meadow, gently sloping up to some dark woods.
The stream was small, clean, fast flowing and ideal for dam-making. It seems now as though I played there all and every summer.
Favourite stones and rocks gave the dams shape and strength. Tacky clay waterproofed the structure. Spillways and canals controlled the water-flow from the growing lagoon backing up between the grass banks. Handy sticks became sailing craft or warships voyaging between lakeside ports occasionally threatened by clay bombs or skimming stones. The day always ended with the grand breaching of the dam and the fun of a cataclysmic flood.
 
My best friend at Sunday school whispered tall stories about proper school. It was built on a steep hillside in town and had two playgrounds. Only the older children were allowed up the steps to the hidden higher playground. Up there, he fibbed, could be found the special fairground with merry-go-rounds, super slides and bumper cars. Everything came free. I dreamt about the fair. The colours, sounds and smells. Best of all the children were in charge of the rides. I couldn’t wait to be off with dad in the mornings on my way to school.
I somehow lost a spark of humour when I eventually got there. My carefree life assaulted by sour smells and noise. I’d always felt free to be myself and gently tease when I noticed adults playing their games and pretending. School was a different matter.
A little boy in a big class quickly learnt the new rules and stored up the strange, the tedious, the frustrating and plain daft to the end of the day. Dad would pick me up from the school gate in his car and I would immediately start spilling the beans on this education lark. It was hardly the best time for him to hear this stuff and his responses were often short and sharp. Little boys apparently knew nothing about this sort of thing and should concentrate on their learning. I learnt a lot about hedges on those journeys home.
 
There were times as we planted and weeded in the evenings when dad talked a little about childhood. He had grown up in a small seaside town backed by wild hills and moorland. Things at home were a real struggle. He hardly remembered his own father who had been killed when away in the army. His mother survived on a small widow’s pension and made a little extra in the summer letting rooms to sea-side visitors. Dad helped by camping out in the field behind the house during holidays. His room brought in some useful extra cash. His mum, who he adored, was a regular chapelgoer and took dad along. He loved the singing and admired the fiery welsh pastor. When times were particularly hard the minister’s wife would call in discreetly with simple gifts from the more caring members of the congregation
 
Dad would often spend days alone in the hills and woods. He camped out with increasing skill and confidence and brought home firewood, berries and indeed anything that could be legally gathered. He was still very young and suffered all the natural childhood fears and anxieties. When unnerved by woodland noises he thought of the pastor’s words. ‘If you are good and trust Jesus, He will protect you.’
So it turned out! With every safe awakening Dad’s faith grew stronger.
He found he could stop those wild imaginings and prevent his mind wandering. He studied the woods and its inhabitants. He learnt the names of the trees, the birds, the insects and the flowers. Dad felt safe and at home there.
 
He became a good headmaster. His strength of character and endless energy and enthusiasm ensured the school did well. His hard work became recognized and he went frequently away on courses and conferences. He would ask me to tend the garden knowing that I could be trusted to weed and water and harvest the vegetables. (Mum was out shopping for quick meals the very next day) These daily tasks were happily done but for some reason the garden paths started to attract my attention. I felt some deeper satisfaction levelling the gravel, weeding between the flagstones and trimming the grass. It made a sort of immediate difference that interested and appealed to me. Much more satisfying for a young boy than watching over the vegetable patch tediously marking the passing seasons. After one long absence dad came home to a tidy garden and a brand new shingle path winding down to the stream. He bought me an army-surplus tent and second hand sleeping bag.
 
The wood at the top of the meadow could be like two different places. With dad or friends or even the friend’s dog, it was an exciting adventure land filled with bird song, rabbits and rich earthy smells. When alone I was jumpy and nervous.
This, I kept strictly to myself.
Dad suggested I pitched my new tent against the fence where the meadow bordered the wood. That summer it stayed firmly the garden side of the stream.
 
Later in the year, the stream began to loose its appeal. Despite the delights of clay and water, the dams became increasingly unsatisfying. Play like this was no longer enough. Real dams were in my mind from books and television. Real dams with a purpose and permanence that were built with knowledge of materials and mathematics. Part of me was ready for something new.
 
That summer dad took me on a camping expedition. I loved getting out the maps and laid them out on my bedroom floor weeks before we set off. Maps were the only thing I collected and I papered my walls with the world. We drove to the hills and moorland, the car topped up with supplies for a fortnight.
We walked and climbed and nattered in the mist and rain and pitched the tent wherever we fancied. On these long walks dad talked again about his school days, perhaps prompted by my impending move to secondary school. He had shone at his first school. He enjoyed learning and possessed a steely determination and sharp competitive edge. He eventually won a scholarship to a good school a long daily bus ride away. The money for books and uniform had to be borrowed this time.
‘Boys talk’, as he called it, filled the back of the bus along with the cigarette smoke. Adolescent stirrings had recently started to bother him. (As he rather awkwardly put it!) He felt a clear, stark choice had to be made. If he were to really succeed at school these thoughts and feelings would have to be controlled and suppressed. That summer he set off for the hills and woods for several weeks.
This time he challenged himself, taking risks when swimming, climbing and camping in rugged, wild places. He tested himself in every way he could.
Each Sunday dad made the trek back to chapel. The elderly pastor still preached passionately to his now diminishing congregation. Dad listened to those old fashioned words about God’s rewards for those who overcome their animal instincts. At the end of the summer dad’s eyes were firmly focused on the prize of high academic achievement.
His mission was to pay off that loan, strive for a career that would see him escape from poverty and ensure his mum lived out her days in comfort.
He now sat alone, tough in mind and body, at the front of the bus.
 
Our expedition was going well but after a few days trekking we needed some rest and a chance to wash and dry our clothes. A break in the weather found us down a grass track in a disused and sheltered quarry alongside a lake. Camp was made and in late afternoon with all our housekeeping done Dad wanted to rest and read. I set out to explore.
 
An old road followed the edge of the lake towards a steep sided gorge. A newer wider road joined the track towards what I could now glimpse was a dam. The narrowness of the gorge and the wooded hillsides had hidden it from our camp. Despite some doubts about trespass the sound of tumbling water drew me closer. The place appeared totally deserted. Alongside the road, a concrete basin had been built separated from the lake by steel gratings. This mesh held back driftwood and debris. In this black pool, right alongside the dam wall, swirls of water caught my eye. Whirlpools like enormous bath plugholes. I stepped back from the railings a little but walked purposefully out onto the dam to lean over the lip and watch the water gushing from the base. Another higher pitched turbine sound came from deep inside the bulk of the structure. For a moment It seemed to be alive and sensing my unwelcome presence. I froze for a second then ran.
 
I marched myself back to camp angry and exasperated. I knew about dams and understand the structure, the noises, and the purpose of the whole thing. What was this stupid fear and anxiety? What was the matter with me?
On the way back I calmed myself by collecting wood for the fire. Dad by now had started cooking up corned beef stew. I went down to the lakeside, paddled around and busied myself with driftwood and pebbles.
 
Perhaps the magic quality of the light tipped me into that strange other worldly state. My body relaxing from days of tough hill walking, now bathed in a balmy warmth and stillness. Wide eyed at the stunning natural beauty of the place. Playing mental games with hypnotically exact reflections of mountain slopes, shoreline trees and the red streaked sky.
The sun was slowly setting over the hills at the far end of the lake. A shimmering orange glow formed a path right to my feet. Maybe I took that path, reached the setting sun and headed back, way up in that amazing sky. I felt very strange but wanting to hold that feeling for a while glimpsing my world through new eyes. This young boy here at this very moment, on a path to his future, only needing to be completely true to himself.
And above all, the intoxicating recognition that reality was indefinably strange. That human experience was somehow paradoxical and that dear dad, would not be the person to talk with about this.
 
We ate and chatted, washed up in the lake and settled down in our sleeping bags. Dad was soon asleep. I lay on my back, hands behind my head staring at nothing in particular.
Thought chased feeling chased wonder. Sleep would be a long time coming.
That night, despite the promise of the red sky, the weather changed. A light whisper of rain stopped my thinking. We had pitched our tent well. The quarry side sheltered us from the strengthening gusts of wind and the gravel soil drained away the worst of the now streaming rain. Dad and I safe together, in the best of places and enjoying the best of moments, for the very last time.
 
Several years passed before I returned to these hills and lakes. I was leading a group of friends on a camping expedition along with other teams from the same school. I led my group and drove them hard through foul weather and rough country to each campsite. We were usually cosily settled and well fed in our tent by the time the other groups struggled in.
On this particular morning we were marching fast on the ridge above my well-remembered lake. We were ahead again and as the weather had settled we stopped in the shelter of a rocky outcrop for a break. I could just make out the quarry and even the ring of stones forming the fireplace Dad and I had used years before. This was now the last day of the expedition. We were top dogs by far. I said nothing, my friends’ conversations turned to school and the imminent final exams.
Power, strength and any sense of purpose just drained from me as I slumped on that rock. Some things had gone very wrong since those camping days with dad. I now had no idea what to do in life. I was bored and miserable at home, confused and fed up at school. I had never made any real start at formal learning and bumped and scraped along with no enthusiasm whatever. I daydreamed and fantasised, doodled and drifted and did just enough to keep out of trouble. I drew lakes and mountains in the margins of my notebooks, overdrawing detail upon detail until they all turned dark.
 
The camping expeditions were different. In rough country and in bad weather, real risks invoked deep reaction. Meaning for a moment was survival. I focused, studied and prepared, confident in the landscapes and scenarios created in my mind. I could make things happen, be powerful, skilful and in control. I knew what would happen next. I could lead and be trusted under pressure.
I carried the maps. I was constantly adding to my collection and cared for them well. The mapmaker provided the marks on paper that seemed to demonstrate rather than describe. This gave me the freedom to convert his signs to symbols and create a personal picture. The maps now became, in part, my design and my world. One in which plans could be made and successfully acted upon. Things really did work here.
 
These periods of enthusiasm and flashes of excitement were fine while they lasted. Things held together until the wider world eventually and inevitably broke through.
A world in which there seemed to be no meaning, no satisfaction and no future. I found myself on a roundabout of persistent and compulsive quilt and anxiety. Thought led to feeling and back to the same thought. There was neither a path to follow nor things to achieve. It was a grim time of stubborn resistance and quiet desperation.
Things had changed at home. An atmosphere of disappointment and tension had gradually developed. Dad’s energy and enthusiasm had waned with age. It was clearly becoming very hard work. He looked permanently weary and headed alone for his beloved hills at every opportunity. We now talked very little.
 
I thought of escape. The actual challenge of starting something completely new, in itself, did not frighten me. The problem, rather strangely, came down to ‘enthusiasm’. Surviving in totally different circumstances would demand total commitment- for a while. But for what? Would it turn out to be worth the effort? Would it last? I knew understanding lay deep within me somewhere. I also knew that false enthusiasm would inevitably mask any glimpse of real meaning. I had become so practised at pleasing people that I was able to temporarily convince myself.
 
It was obvious that I had to get away from home to seek some real sense of personal control. Critically, I needed to be in a situation where I could be in total command of any enthusiasm. It was vital to know precisely when and exactly how I was faking.
I needed to wait in my own chosen space until something or somebody interesting turned up. I had papers and passport ready for the Outback but I chose what might have been for me a far bleaker wilderness.
 
I packed my bag and went teaching.

 
 
And now, almost a lifetime later, much of my world is marked out by the old walled garden that I watch over from my study window. These weatherworn walls were built to shelter a market garden predating this present house by a century. They now enclose a space I often find myself pondering.
 
A blackbird is scratching in the gravel against the sun dappled north wall, messing up the patterns of the fine shingle path.
As I reflect here, now, my eyes are drawn, as they have been many times before, to the point where the path meets the brick wall. What is the attraction? What entices me to finish the raking with a crisp edge? An obsession of sorts I suppose, but no search for certainty. It is a meditative activity attending to particular qualities of these interacting objects. It is an itch demanding a scratch.
 
The Zen metaphor comes to mind of raked shingle as water matching the ebb and flow of unconstrained life. We make ripples in a world in which we belong- one small part of everything.The wall marks our chosen ground. If we are to make things happen throughout life we require a construct, a context for action.
 
It is the interface that fascinates me -where the shingle and the wall appear both joined and separated -at the edge softened by a clump of fine bamboo, its shadow playing on the brickwork. The attraction is this rich mix of the visceral and emotional. The raw materials of an affective responsivity I naturally crave.
 
 
As I watch the birds in their bath flitting between a sudden terror of the neighbour’s cat on the old brick wall and the preening delight of the water it is clear we humans are not quite like them. Their stress goes with the cat and only I am left to worry about them. The birds and more evidently the cat, are what they are- they act and rest with an efficiency we can only dream about.
 
Despite the extra complexity of human life, it is important for us to maintain the potential to act instictively in a raw polar manner. We retain a capacity (no matter how rarely used) to abandon ourselves to powerful action during which there is no room for doubt or ambiguity. Chemical messengers course through the body increasing the heart rate readying us for committed action. This potent sympathetic part of our visceral nervous system is balanced by the para-sympathetic system which is concerned with the conservation and restoration of energy. We rest and recuperate, preparing once more for action. Whether in real time or play, it is the bio-chemical tone emanating from the interface of these core systems that forms the basis of physical and mental good health.
 
Extreme action of any category is accompanied by risk but once the threshold to instinctual action is passed any attempt to dampen polar behaviour will increase the probability of failure. There can be no half measures or distractions at these times. The immediacy of ‘forceful aggressive’ and ‘intense loving’ action squeezes out time and space. Positive feedback operates here. An edge is passed beyond which there is an incremental increase in the intensity of response triggered by a chemical feedback cascade. After instinctual action the body relaxes deeply- if it has survived!
It is crucial to retain this ability to act at both extremes- to imagine and to be willing to risk the fighting as well as the mating. This is a key part of the dynamic balancing process that enables our bodies to relax and be revived and for us to be vital and self confident as human beings.
 
Of course, our day to day living is far more routine and any extreme action likely to be a sign of failure. The reading of our environment and circumstances must be accurate enough to sidestep trouble and to achieve this we must be attending with a sense of immediacy and with accurate reference to previous experience. There has to be constant refreshment and fluidity- we must live in the here and now but we must also be prepared.
 
 
How can we weave a simple metaphor that best cradles the somewhat paradoxical essence of human consciousness? This will never be easy. Even at the most basic of levels we are amazingly complex and this complexity is compounded by being overlain by more evolutionary advanced structures that operate in similar and interconnected ways.
An initial handle on this complexity attends to the interface of what could be described as ‘inner’ and ‘outer’ personal space.
A starting point can be found in the primitive pre-conscious processing that links the inner modulating activity of the autonomic nervous system with the external reach of the sensory somatic system. By restricting attention in this way we can model a response matrix linking the action/rest valence of the autonomic with the approach/avoid valence of the sensory somatic. This notion of matrix cuts down on complexity by linking matched pairs. We can imagine their separate functioning and also their interaction.
And here at its most simple we find a blueprint for consciousness- there are times to think about the ‘inner’ and ‘outer’ as separate and there are times to think of them as joined. There are times for investigating and times for acting. Our inner and outer worlds are both joined and separated- a paradox of sorts.
 
 
The cat is back in its usual sunny spot, tail twitching as it eyes the blackbird grubbing around a tree stump. Is the cat thinking- spending time gleaning data? Is there some interplay between his physical being and simple conscious processing?
Perhaps we humans share in part the cat’s world view. A basic formalation tagged with primary emotions. This underlying memory structure supports the systematizing that enables the cat to fine tune his responses, successfully satisfy his primary needs and thereby reinforce or modify his memory bank.
The self awareness of humans immediately adds another level of consciousness and a leap in complexity. Just like the cat we give time for the interplay of feeling and simple memory. ‘How do I feel?’ and ‘What is around?’ This attention increases the diversity and depth of the patterns that form. The more emotional boxes ticked in this process the better. In humans this general picture, the gist, is cognitively scanned for potential sequences and particular detail. Through this imaginal process we generate and organise a higher order of emotionally tagged memory and facilitate far more sophisticated functional responses to circumstances.
 
Our original blueprint still applies. For us humans, what could be labelled as affective and cognitive processes represent the ‘inner’ and the ‘outer’. When investigating they are separated. And of course smooth skilled action requires them to be as one.
 
 
Sam, a retired builder, repaired winter storm damage to the high wall last spring. He brought his equally elderly road compressor to break out some concrete footings. It coughed and wheezed to a halt several times on the damp day I watched from my desk. He poked around inside for a while and talked about electrics and the puzzle of the override button when I brought him tea.
Next morning Sam came with tool box, overalls and a notebook. The day was warm and the price of the wall fixed- there was no urgency.
Old clothes on, spanner in hand, Sam disappeared into the bowels of the machine emerging after a while to wash the grime from his hands and then scribble away on his notepad. This apparent gleaning of raw information and then reflecting continued throughout the day until a final tea-break, when, surrounded by neat piles of bits and pieces, he valiantly tried to explain to me his latest version of the electrics from the smudged diagram in his book. He knew a lot more than the day before but was still uncertain as to the exact problem. Some unexplored wires disappeared even deeper into the labyrinth.
The following day Sam came early, had the front of the machine apart in double quick time, fixed a hidden loose connection, reassembled the lot and broke out the concrete slab before lunch- the compressor never missing a beat. He left early for the pub before I had time to ask.
 
Eventually we did have a natter about this shift in pace and understanding. In his bath (surely one of the best thinking places), he had imagined the original designer considering the conditions in which his pristine and elegantly engineered machine would be working. Muddy wet, cold labourers who need to get on with the job to come alive on winter mornings. If their compressor is not maintained -will they notice warning lights from their trench? And so, these crucial wires led to automatic safety cut-outs, overridden just at start up.
It turned out very simple and logical and made tracing that last wire well worth while. His pint, I’m sure, had tasted particularly good.
 
Sam’s grubby circuit diagram spread out on my desk points to circumstances when cognitive processing can be seen as an abstract form of the affective matrix. The affective interface of instinct and emotion is reflected in the cognitive mode through the tension between the dual polarities of attend/ignore and true/false.
I suspect for Sam there was a preliminary sorting process. He needed to be sure enough that the proposed procedure was necessary, interesting and had a reasonable chance of success. He also needed to be comfortable and suitably equipped for the job. The old clothes and dirty hands signalled the intention of getting into the machine and gleaning all available data. There would be an intuition that crucial evidence would be missed without this total commitment. The mental focus would be to maintain the attentive quality of all the senses. Peering, sniffing, feeling warmth or cold, getting under the covers, embracing the patterns but holding back from the rationale of the machine. Then sensing the right time to step back, clean up and with pen and paper, generate true/false sequences out of these patterns until a spinning head indicated the need to return to the machine or have a break.
 
Whilst not wanting to dwell too long on Sam in his bath it is interesting to think about the circumstances where we set plans aside and attend to design. Initially the rational mind investigates the properties of the machine, critically evaluating every aspect. We ratchet up the scientific process, doubting every easy answer and not rushing to any resolution.
Then the meta-ritualistic bath-time flip. Images of the machine in use are generated, shared, as it were with the designer. Out of this abstract dialogue comes new insight- the eventual users of the machine must not be punished for ignoring its engineering excellence. Good design in this context supports ordinary workers doing a tough job in appalling conditions. They do not need a siren call advertising machine misuse. Silence and a warning light are enough. The quality of the design depends upon a genuine understanding and consideration of these men. Good design is in part a measure of humility.
 
 
 
Now it is summer and children are playing in the sandpit down by the wall shaded by an old apple tree. I occasionally hold this image of a young child playing here alone, in that fantasy world with warm evening sun, all fears and needs set aside, no parental interruptions and no hidden presents from the cat. This child simply wants to feel ‘at home in the world’-a natural instinctive need.
The captivating thing about sand is the range of responses it evokes at the most basic of levels. As sand flows smoothly through the fingers it draws us in like water. It is an irresistible invitation to be completely as one with life itself -to feel connected and part of everything. We touch, we feel, we look, and as we do so we sense the sand through an underlying receptive structure. As we process these natural qualities of sand, we create patterns that inevitably encroach into our conscious mind. The partial meaning of these patterns provokes more thoughtful scrutiny. We need to explore some more and this might entail an active mark- a sign of the here and now. Four sheer sides of a sand castle can be enough to set the mind in motion. Here now, at this very moment, attending in turn to the shapes we have made. Now we have the beginnings of sequence as well as pattern in our emerging understanding of the qualities of sand. We can start using the word ‘sand’ with confidence. Language can be built on it.
 
In play the child can explore, freely switching between affective and cognitive modes, in a safe supported setting with no real concern for outcome. Satisfying play depends upon good feedback between these modes of experience. The quality of feedback relies very much upon balance. Children know (and adults tend to forget) that both aspects are of equal significance. Play is very much about getting this balance right. It is the symmetry of playing and not the pace that is important.
This sense of balance is crucial in the development and use of language. The value of the words we use is rooted in the symbolic way they cradle both affective and cognitive meaning. Our confidence in the use of these words depends upon a stable balance in their symbolic structure. We need to trust the words that we use, as through them, we join that which is essentially separate. They mark the space between.
 
There is in all children, a natural desire to know ‘what happens next?’ If children can anticipate, they can adapt and so successfully survive. Play stimulates an internal story-spinning process that harmonises affective and cognitive processing. Good playing requires balance- good story-spinning requires rhythm. The resulting story can be projected forward and tested in the imagination. If it holds up it is likely to be of real use when asking ‘what happens next?’
 
The child might sense that a certain rigour is required here. The story may be fragile and so remain vulnerable to the pressures of raw experience. To be of use, a story has to survive any immediate, partial threat. There must, therefore, be commitment to holding the whole thing. It must be remembered.
A natural way of stabilizing an internal story is to express it in a form that will survive this immediate threat. Children who are asking ‘what happens next?’ will start telling their stories. It is crucial that they find an attentive enough audience if they are to create objects they can trust, as some leap of faith is inevitable. To be of use these stories require a degree of stability. But stability only comes through use.
 
In smooth action we respond to circumstances as they arise by placing ourselves within the metaphoric space between the affective and cognitive modes. The flexibility inherent in this process smoothes out minor irregularities and maintains a natural buffering ability enabling us to deduce meaning from incomplete messages. Smooth action has a play-like pace and rhythm. A mild sense of reaching forward, an itch of anticipation, maintains the momentum.
 
Of course the realities of day to day living inevitably disturb this story spinning state and we need ways to handle breaks in smooth action. If no panic buttons have been pressed we scan our mood and mind, seeking knots that can easily be teased out. If the disturbance remains we attend to the detail. A simple ritual sets aside a thinking space within which the problem can emerge. We attend to the disturbance as we would a new object in play. We seek pattern and sequence, generating feedback between the affective and cognitive modes until the problem becomes clear enough to act upon. We then act and adjust – or not.
There are times when problems stubbornly remain. Now is the time for deeper reflecting and new questions need to be asked. There is a requirement to step back further. It may be time for change -time to ‘make things happen.’
 
 
It is now midsummer and one of those magical, balmy, never ending evenings. The swifts have stopped their noisy chase around the roof tops and soared high for the night. A bat is showing similar skills flitting through the overhanging oak. I am quiet on a bench against the high wall which is still radiating stored heat from the day. A child is asleep in a tent pitched on the grass, tight against the sheltering west wall. This has been his home for the summer. This is amongst the best of times.
 
It would seem natural that most children, at some time, experience a sense of wonder at the world and glimpse, however fleetingly or idiosyncratically, the mysterious nature of human existence. Times of deeper reflecting become for some moments of intense heightened awareness. Perhaps the more restrictive the environment or more rigid the personal defence mechanisms, the greater the potential intensity of these occasions.
 
The use of the word 'transcendental' best cradles the nature of the experience- the strange, other worldly, timeless observing of the moment. Transcendental sounds what it feels like.
A characteristic of these moments is that there is an awareness of two differing but linked notions. Firstly, that ‘everything is as one’ and that in recognising this, the ‘I as beholder’ am subsumed in the ‘one’ - I belong here as an individual and can adapt to the world. The second element is that there is for the individual, a potential and indeed imperative to live life. ‘Things can and need to be done.’ The link between the two ideas is indefinable but the emotional charge of simultaneously locating oneself both individually and socially triggers a feedback cascade leading towards an overwhelming sense of being at home and of loving the world.
 
It is important in relation to this writing to differentiate between childhood and adolescent transcendental experience. For the adolescent this is the space where ideas become visions and crucial choices are made. The experience invigorates and informs and can be re-visited through personal ritual to prime the processes of living and maintain a purposeful life.
For the child what has to be done first is to gain independence, to be oneself, to be able at crucial moments to say 'no'. And if saying 'no' proves too difficult then acting 'no' has to be enough
 
 
 
Gregory Bateson, a creative thinker with a fascinating range of linked interests, promoted (in the 1940’s) the concept of double bind in relation to mental illness. His ideas were of limited use in terms of explaining serious illness but have proved valuable when considering mental processes and potential threat to mental health. The general characteristics of double bind situations are expressed by Bateson in this way:
 1. ‘When the individual is involved in an intense relationship; that is, a relationship in which he feels it is vitally important that he discriminate accurately what sort of message is being communicated so that he may respond appropriately.
 2. And, the individual is caught in a situation in which the other person in the relationship is expressing two orders of message and one of these denies the other.
 3. And, the individual is unable to comment on the messages being expressed to correct his discrimination of what order of message to respond to, i.e., he cannot make a metacommunicative statement.’

(Gregory Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind 1972)
 
My introductory statement for this article noted the separate nature of the processes of discovering and creating and described them as being different realms of experience. This notion is of particular significance when considering double binds. I suggest that in double bind situations traps exist in both realms of experience thereby preventing effective reflection, learning and the enjoyment of life.
 
It is important at this stage to re-emphasise why processes of discovering and processes of creating can be described as different, despite both being adaptive features of human development. The investigative processes of discovering can be taken to be a natural evolutionary development of mammalian behaviour. We learn, as do many animals, to increase our chances of survival and success by adapting to our environment. Creating, however, is fundamentally different, as it stems from the uniquely human psychological awareness of mortality. We cannot flourish if we are gripped by the knowledge of death. We seek purpose in our lives primarily to overcome this fear.
 
The realm of discovering encompasses intuitive action and problem forming. The flexibility of smooth intuitive action relies upon a balanced and dynamic interface of affective and cognitive processing. Disturbances of intuitive action are a natural feature of day to day living and here, just like Sam with his troublesome compressor, we stop for a moment to reflect. Our first task is to allow the problem to form and in order to do this we draw upon memories.
 
The affective/cognitive interface of smooth intuitive action is reflected in problem forming through the interaction of episodic and semantic memory. In this basic model, episodic memory is our recall of life experiences and semantic memory our store of theoretical knowledge. Episodic memory can be thought of as a string of semi-stable personal stories that sub-consciously inform the here and now. We create and moderate these stories by processing emotionally charged events. In ideal circumstances these experiential notions reflect a comprehensive and rigorously honest sense of individuality and provide positive support to day by day living.
 
Episodic memory is particularly important during social interaction. If we can be accepting of ourselves we are likely to be open minded and sensitive towards others. We will pick up the overall pattern of situations- the gist. The flexibility of episodic memory allows the sense of ‘more’ significant and ‘less’ significant to inform our reading of experience. This is crucial in terms of maintaining an open mind for long enough for the gist to be revealed. If we turn too quickly to the detail of a situation and apply our theoretical knowledge the ‘more’ or ‘less’ episodic axis is buried under the true/false formulas of semantic memory. Little room remains for ‘perhaps’ or ‘maybe’ or indeed ‘good enough’.
 
The creative realm generates the sense of identity and purpose that supports smooth intuitive action and effective problem solving. Disturbances naturally break into intuitive action. Meta-disturbances from the realm of creative identity also unsettle the routines of day to day living and demand significant developments in how we view and how we do things. Some meta-changes are responses to immediate situations and circumstance; some reflect the part meta-action plays in moderating the anxiety emanating from our human awareness of mortality.The creative representations of reality generated by meta-action cradle this anxiety allowing us to feel, in part, liberated and invigorated.
Discovering enables us to learn, creating allows us to enjoy life. Learning and enjoyment are the key features of a lived life.
 
It seems likely that most people experience moments of heightened awareness at some time in their lives- moments best labelled as transcendental. Transcendental experience is challenging and exciting because it marks the moments when we glimpse existential paradox.
In discovering we recognise that we are a product of our particular human experience and history. In creating we recognise that as adults we are free to choose what is to be significant in our lives and are required to choose who we are becoming. The paradox in these terms is that we are both bound and free. Transcendental experience is transforming in that this paradoxical essence of human experience is revealed, recognised and accepted. The transforming experience is unrepeatable but in personal ritual the paradox can be approached and re-experienced.
Our sense of purpose and meaning is rooted in these moments of transcendental wonder when personal and cultural identity spark. At these times we feel at home in the world and see a course of action in life. This notion, this vision, informs both action and learning. If it is ignored or denied, chronic identity problems are likely to occur that will disrupt action and learning.
 
A double bind forms when traps develop simultaneously in the realms of discovering and creating. A focus upon two statements may offer an illustration here:
 1.Rational thinking controls emotion
 2.Academic achievement brings freedom
 
Although both notions are crucially flawed, they hold enough commonplace acceptance to disguise this fact. Indeed, when the statements are taken independently, these flaws are not particularly significant. If the two statements are combined, there is a tendency for embedded snags to link up and generate potentially serious difficulties. The notion that emotions should be rationally controlled usually comes down to a belief in the suppression of instinctive arousal. Authoritarian adults are intuitively reluctant to accept that children must retain and nurture the capacity to react instinctively and therefore independently in certain situations. They forget that to live well and wisely is to retain this fundamental independence of spirit. Healthy emotion emerges, along with language, from well balanced pre-verbal responses to the world. Therefore, any serious attempt to suppress emotion inevitably leads to difficulty as it denies the reality and validity of this sub-symbolic process.
 
The other aspect of this example of double-bind is more obvious. The dangers of suggesting academic achievement brings freedom are clear. There is an implication in this statement that personal knowledge will come only with time. That you must wait for meaning in your life and be unconcerned, at this moment, with ‘how’ you know. It is a belief that denies the validity of a personal perspective and suggests that you are not yet qualified to comment on your own life. Wisdom will always be along later.
 
If the two notions are foisted simultaneously upon a trusting recipient they might easily be conflated. The immediate connection is likely to be between the ideas of ‘rational control’ and ‘academic achievement’. Surrounding similarities are cancelled out leaving the false formula: ‘rational control of emotion brings freedom’. This is a fundamentally false and destructive belief. A double-bind is created along with a sure path towards chronic insecurity and anxiety. Some way out will be eventually required and it will never be straightforward. A ‘step out’ rather than a ‘step back’ now becomes necessary.
 
Childhood transcendental experience is likely to combine a sense that ‘everything is as one’ with an imperative to ‘live life to the full.’ We might interpret this awareness as ‘we are as one with God' and ‘God will guide us’. We might choose to accept this as a supporting story by which to live life sensing that further investigation will not make things work better. Perhaps we have heard of writers, artists and philosophers who have delved far more deeply but appear to be no happier.
If we trust that God will guide us, a simple daily ritual can be enough. The equivalent of kneeling in submission and then sorting the day ahead. We can accept that full responsibility must be taken for some things and that others can be safely left in the hands of God. All very simple then.
When trapped in double bind this straightforward practice and trust does not work. The ambiguity implied in ‘we are as one with God’ and ‘God will guide us’ cannot be accepted and is now (quite correctly) interpreted as paradox. To state the metaphoric tension here in a raw way - if we are as one with God we do not die. If we have a task in this lifetime, we do.
 
The trust given freely through a neutral acceptance of ambiguity now has to be regenerated through an active acceptance of paradox. Simple daily rituals are not enough for this difficult task. Paradox must be brought to mind, re-experienced, acknowledged and accepted. Only then can the day ahead be effectively imagined, thought through and begun. To face this we need a meta-ritual that induces the experience of paradox.
 
The realisation and acceptance of existential paradox can be a source of humour, heart-warming emotion and indeed excitement. (It is far more liberating than a contradiction!) So much of our busyness is a distraction and denial of this essential truth as we attempt to distance ourselves from the reality and significance of our mortality. And because we all tend to do so, no matter what our intelligence and no matter how knowledgeable we become - then we can afford a very human smile.
But in double-bind, when our detachment from paradox has perhaps become the only certainty and security in our lives, when fantasy joins thought and feeling, when creative living ceases and when depression closes in - what then can be done?
We can reach back for that smile, mark it down on paper, keep hold of the paper and look at the evidence now and again.
 
We start writing.
 
 
Donald Winnicott, the child psychiatrist and influential object relations theorist, refers to a sequence of states as being generally part of any therapeutic process. (Playing and Reality p56 1971)
 1. Relaxation in conditions of trust based on experience.
 2. Creative, physical, and mental activity manifested in play.
 3. The summation of these experiences forming the basis for a sense of self.
 
As a psychotherapist we would expect Winnicott to elaborate his ideas through examples of his work with patients. In the case notes following this list, it is Winnicott who facilitates the initial relaxation, stimulates play and is of course an essential part of the summation through reflecting back in a shared space what he senses to be significant.
It is interesting to set these stages alongside ideas of therapeutic journal writing in cases of double bind. There appear to be marked similarities and also the appealing possibility of dispensing with the services of a therapist along with the risks of explanatory interpretation. This aspect is particularly significant in double binds as in these circumstances the breakdown in trust is not with the people themselves but towards the model of human experience they appear to insist upon. The problem becomes one of language. In these instances there is likely to be a deep resistance to any talking cure. The therapist might well be trusted but the language used will remain a major barrier.
 
The ten year old birthday boy is wondering what his money might buy. There is nothing particular in mind but it would be fun to shop even though town is miles away. 'Much better to add it to your savings' is the advice, 'It is good to save for later.'
The exams are coming soon and the older brother has been rewarded with a cash bonus.
'If you do as well I will make up your account to match his.'
'But why am I saving money if.....?'
'Don't worry dear boy. I'll make sure you'll not miss out.'
One more challenge would disappoint. Two might annoy. And so the trap is poised.

 
Models of human experience tend to be descriptive rather than explanatory. Models invite participation and support investigation and these activities always involve language. The dynamic interaction of discovering (adapting and learning) and creating (making good things happen) is a key feature of a lived life and in some form is part of any useful model of human experience. The flexibility of language enables us to handle these differing realms with a degree of confidence.
 
In double bind situations the model offered inhibits the development of language by devaluing these dual processes of discovering and creating. Discovering requires an active balance between affective and cognitive modes of experience- between memories 'of' and memories 'about'. Creating requires a sense of individual choice and freedom of expression- a sense of becoming. The very complexity here masks the falseness of models, for example, that suggest emotional responses should be suppressed or that individual freedom is insignificant until maturity. If the healthy development of language is inhibited, pathological activity starts to surface. Discovering and creating are reflected in fantasy and obsessive/ compulsive behaviours, all of which lead towards dissociation and a breakdown in self confidence.
 
In double binds, traps operate simultaneously in the realms of discovering and of creating. Therefore it seems reasonable to suggest that any therapeutic intervention should mirror this duality. Double binds are characterised by a breakdown of trust in language. It is only through the regeneration of this trust that a sense of individuality and self confidence can be restored. An obvious starting point is some form of writing.
 
A personal journal can be trusted for what it is. In overwhelming anxiety and insecurity it can be relied on to hold almost anything and everything - from anxiety holding doodles, through early organisational efforts, to flashes of deep insight. A journal offers a space that encourages new form by allowing formlessness. A space where feeling and thinking can be teased apart by the asking of simple paired questions. 'How am I feeling?' / 'What am I thinking?' By working hard at this we will start noticing the interaction between memories 'of' and memories 'about', between affective and cognitive modes of experience and how they are both joined and separated in the realm of discovery.
And then- as we cradle our feelings and thinking and relax with the paradoxical notion of them being both joined and separated, unexpected events sometimes occur. A flip into the creative realm can take place, evoking visions of a purposeful, satisfying and fully lived life. Although these ideas are not fully formed, we sense there is a contribution to be made.
 
When things have gone seriously wrong in life, the space between discovering and creating is often invaded by defence mechanisms. These we learn to trust in our own perverse ways. In these circumstances we will resist writing, as it challenges these carefully crafted defences. Any new writing effort will require some special support and words are not necessarily the best way to start. The patterns and sequences found in drawings can often offer some comforting opening ritual. Making the first non-threatening marks on the page makes a difference. Doing something - doing anything is the starting point. It is the geometry of journal keeping that is so appealing. The play between pattern and sequence that is impossible to replicate on a computer screen. Each playful spin creates an imaginative lift - a space where we can be amused and pencil-mark our defensive habits and strategies. A new code of annotation can now develop, overlaying our personal narrative. It is through these notes, the underscores, arrows and explanation marks, that trust is nurtured.
 
What is it with words? Perhaps that so many mental traps are sprung in this way. Where the ideas held by the misuse of words have replaced creative thinking. In these circumstances words become both the problem but also remain the path back.
Where can we start with these words? We may have lost the ability to accurately perceive and predict or tell a useful personal story but we rarely lose our sensitivity towards our use of words. We can tell when we are misusing them. When we are being lazy, obscure or dishonest. We are either comfortable or uncomfortable. When we talk to ourselves we can pretend otherwise, when we write we know.
But knowing does not make it inviting, easy or indeed possible. The process of writing, the initial process of story spinning, has in itself to be made appealing. We have to remove the sting. Thinking and feeling brought to the journal may not be immediately accepted but the effort of recording must be maintained. No matter how desperate the troubles, a sense of the strange and amusing will be around somewhere. The first rule for this preliminary effort is to ‘write until you smile’. And with that smile, that spark of humour, a moment’s relaxation can be allowed. A spin has been induced in the learning loop and a start has been made.
 
We can mark differences within our written narrative by noting the flash of excitement attached to humour. By acknowledging with a smile our very human frailties and mistakes, we maintain momentum towards a truthful but warm picture of ourselves. The humour also encourages re-appraisal as we don’t mind so much going back to the smile.
The requirement to ‘read back through the writing’ is the second rule.
 
A deeper understanding is embedded within the literal humour that supports our written narrative effort. Humour will form clusters separating responses to our affective and cognitive processing. It is important to consider how we respond to these signs of humour when we look back through the writing. It is likely that we will be attracted less by the narrative struggles and more with the tension between a literal and metaphoric interpretation of these moments. There is a shift to an abstract view. The narrative can now be set against the context of personal vision, purpose and our fragile sense of becoming. This is the realm of irony. The appeal of irony is that it provides regular reminders of the essential non-certainty of a lived life. That the unknowable aspects of experiencing inevitably restrict objectivity and that an active edge of ‘knowing subjectivity’ is the best we can hope for. Irony gently reminds us that what we often take to be objective is an illusion and that if we seek wisdom there is no alternative to a fully lived life. Irony rather more harshly reminds us that to maintain the edge of a lived life we inevitably are looking forward. We must accept and embrace our mortality.
 
All this effort, all these human flaws and embarrassing mistakes, all this hard work to live life well so that we can, maybe, leave this life in peace. Not really a smile or a chuckle is appropriate here, more like a deep sigh. It is, in the end, this sense of detachment we need. Perhaps irony can be thought of as a ‘homeopathic’ remedy of sorts. It induces a fleeting glimpse of death so stimulating the basic processes of living.
 
We have to find ways of loving ourselves and we have to find ways of loving life for what it is. If we have religion, and trust its ways of holding ideas - its symbol system and its language, then things are easier. If, for whatever reasons, we don’t possess this trust and we need to create our own way of looking at life and truth - then we have a much harder task. It is one thing, looking inwards - not taking ourselves too seriously and accepting our human nature with all its flaws and weaknesses. It is far more difficult not taking life itself too seriously. To accept and perhaps be quietly amused by the irony at the very heart of the human condition.
Huff and puff as we might, we cannot even be certain of death - only the question - does death exist? And the answer has to be both yes and no.
All we are left with then is paradox and the possibility of a very wry smile.
 
Jim Cheek may occasionally be found at: JimC heek@proa.org.uk
 
 
 References
 Winnicott, Donald.W.
 PLAYING AND REALITY
 Tavistock Publications 1971
 
 Bateson, Gregory.
 STEPS TO AN ECOLOGY OF MIND
 University of Chicago Press 1972
 
 Brookes, W.
 ‘What is Education’
 In TEACHERS FOR TOMORROW
 Edited by Kenyon Calthrop and Graham Owens
 Heinemann Educational Books 1971